TILJournal

Truth In Love: News, Sports, and Culture Analysis and Commentary

48252463911_2d73d08ea5_k

In 1988, a reviewer for the Washington Post wrote the following as part of a review of a re-release of the film “The Manchurian Candidate.”

John Frankenheimer’s “The Manchurian Candidate” was a bold venture in 1962, with its flashy technique and political themes. Now re-released after a 15-year absence, its mobile camera and fluid editing still dazzle. And its story of Cold War intrigue, murky East-West dealings, assassination, brainwashing — and the idea of a glorified cue-card reader playing president — resonates today like never before.”

A little more than 22 years later, I would wholeheartedly agree with this reviewer, and the resonance he mentions applies perfectly to our modern-day Manchurian Candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden.

The Plot

37148460923_906e20f437_wThe plot of this tale from the Cold War era involves plans to replace a candidate for President with a look-alike who serves at the bidding of a nefarious group of Communists. This story begins with a fictional capture of soldiers from an American platoon during the Korean War who are taken to a secret base in Manchuria, a region of China, where they are drugged and brainwashed in preparation for their mission.

I don’t want to spoil anymore of the film for those who haven’t seen it, however, it is an outstanding movie well worth seeing for anyone. It also provides excellent fodder for a comparison of the similarities between a candidate fictionally programmed by Chinese Communists and a real candidate who seems to have been ‘programmed’, to favor China today.

I do not claim that former V.P. Biden has been subjected to brainwashing or that he has been drugged by some mysterious group of Communists from China. However, I would suggest that Biden is already easy to manipulate and would be malleable by China as President without having to resort to any extreme measures such as brainwashing. 

Candidate Biden is easy to manipulate not because of advanced age or touch of senility, but for the same reason, many lifelong politicians are easy to sway. He is and has been for all his adult life a professional politician, and few of those are not easy to manipulate through special interest, rather than public interest, groups. 

Biden Has Always Shown Favor to China

6775955860_79a15a3302_wMoreover, Joe Biden already has a favorable relationship with the Chinese Communist Party that was constructed during his nearly 5 decades as a politician. 

Joe Biden defends this system [Communism in China] — and has since meeting Deng Xiaoping in 1979, when he joined the first US congressional delegation to the People’s Republic. As chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the early 2000s and then as veep, Biden helped along China’s geopolitical rise. Bernie Sanders is thus right to criticize Biden for supporting the grant of Permanent Normal Trade Relations status to China in 2000. A decade later, Biden ­said: “A rising China is a … positive ­development not only for China, but for America.”

In 2013, then VP Biden leveraged some of that favor with the Chinese government to aid his son, Hunter, in what turned out to be some rather shady business dealings in China. These efforts came to fruition in 2017 when, 

…the illustrious vice-presidential son was granted what Chinese commentators described as a Xianchai, a sinecure reserved for offspring of important officials, at BHR Partners. BHR is a $20 billion fund with shareholders that include China Life, China Development Bank and other state-owned entities. China’s State Council calls on BHR to find deals abroad by hiring foreigners with political connections.

A ‘sinecure’ is defined as,

an office or position requiring little or no work, especially one yielding profitable returns.

Sounds like the kind of job Hunter Biden is suited for, given what we already know of his history. In 2019 Biden allegedly resigned from the board of BHR although he was still listed as a member as of March 2020 according to China’s public records.  

Joe Biden’s mental fitness, or lack thereof, will exaggerate the tendency to capitulate to whoever has his ear. It also makes him far more vulnerable to suggestions from other powers in the present campaign. 

Biden Seeks to Reward China

7175277081_42598d8e7f_wNot only has Joe Biden favored China over American interests throughout his political career, but he also hasn’t withdrawn his praise even in the face of the Wuhan COVID-19 threat that the CCP unleashed upon the world. Less than a month ago he had publicly stated that he would roll back the tariffs now in place against China. 

Most recently, Biden said he would end Trump’s tariffs on billions of dollars worth of China-made goods before his aides walked the statement back. Likewise, in 2019, Biden criticized Trump’s tariffs on China

It is noteworthy that Biden’s aides had to ‘walk back’ his pledge to remove tariffs from China. After all, it might not appeal to voters if he appeared to lean toward China in the wake of this pandemic and the chaos that has resulted in its wake. 

It wasn’t necessary for China to turn Joe Biden into a ‘Manchurian’ candidate. He was already tailor-made for the position. 

Thus, it should come as no surprise that because Biden favors Chinese interests, China favors Biden for President. China’s President-for-life Xi would be much happier dealing with a Biden presidency than a second term of President Trump.

China Is an Existential Threat to America and the World

2042195912_305fbb8b65_wSince the fall of the Soviet Union, China has emerged as the preeminent threat to global stability and the existence of America as a free nation. In less than twenty years, China has expanded its territorial influence in the South China Sea [which it virtually claims as its possession], become the second-largest economy on the planet, captured almost a monopoly on manufacture and supply of medicine globally, have turned stolen technology into a mammoth industry of information and means of spying on billions, all while exercising tyrannical power over its populace, including concentration camps for over a million Uyghur Muslims, and substantially building its military and nuclear capabilities at a blistering pace. 

The issues of military and territorial influence in the immense area claimed by China in the South China Sea is a seriously under-appreciated threat to American interests and global stability.

China’s astonishing expansion into the South China Sea’s 1.35 million square miles and its subsequent militarization of the region over the past several years has cultivated a complex security environment. The initial phase of that growing complexity was predicated on geopolitical interest and expansion, notably during U.S. President Barack Obama’s second term in office.

The iron grip of China upon the pharmaceutical industry has come to the fore during the pandemic of COVID-19 which they just ‘happened’ to loose as a plague upon the world. A recent article in “AMAC Magazine” highlighted the fallout of China’s tight-fisted control.

Today…Chinese pharmaceutical companies supply roughly 40% of heparin [a blood-thinning agent] to the United States, about 70% of acetaminophen [Tylenol], and over 90% of antibiotics, vitamin C, ibuprofen, and hydrocortisone. Thus, it is likely that millions of Americans take Chinese-made drugs without being cognizant of the fact.

The fact that China is an existential threat to the entire globe is so evident that, as someone once said, ‘a blind man could see it with a cane.’ That Joe Biden both favors and is beholden to China is just as clear. 

The only real question is whether Biden will get the opportunity to exercise his favoritism toward the malevolent CCP machine, and toward the loss of liberty that will be the result. The only answer should be a resounding no to a Manchurian candidate becoming a Manchurian President.

Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 2 Corinthians 3:17 [ESV]

D.T. Osborn

Featured and Top Image courtesy of Gage Skidmore’s Flickr page – Creative Commons License
Inset Image 1 courtesy of torbakhopper’s Flickr page – Creative Commons License
Inset Image 2 courtesy of Antonio R. Villaraigosa’s Flickr page – Creative Commons License
Inset Image 3 courtesy of Eric Hunsaker’s Flickr page – Creative Commons License
Inset Image 4 courtesy of Yaffa Phillips’ Flickr page – Creative Commons License

All other sources linked or cited in the text

The Manchurian Candidate 2020: Joe Biden

Charlie Gard is a 10 month old baby living in Britain with his parents. He has a terminal disease for which there is no treatment in Great Britain. The government-provided health care of the English isle wishes to disconnect Charlie from life support. His parents, naturally, want him to live. Especially in the wake of two offers to care for and possibly even cure his condition by experimental means.

The Pope and the President of The United States have both offered sanctuary to Charlie. President Trump has made the gracious and heartfelt offer to also give Charlie a chance to live with a new treatment in the U.S. which possibly could save his life.

Social Media Used in a Good Way

This is a too-rare example of social media being used in a good way. President Trump tweeted the offer to bring Charlie to the U.S. Say whatever one will about Trump, he does exhibit sincerity of heart with this action. Moreover, Trump shows a commitment to life and parental rights in reaching out in this way.

On Monday, Trump tweeted that he would be “delighted” to help out in any way possible. The parents of the little boy have lost multiple court cases and now they face the real possibility that the hospital Gard is in could pull life support for their child — even though they don’t want that to happen. …

The parents have responded to Trump’s offer with an enthusiastic yes!

The parents of Gard, Chris and Connie… quickly seized on Trump’s comments and stated that they would continue to fight to save their child — especially now that the pope and the president of the United States were on their side. On Wednesday, a pediatric hospital in Rome owned by the Vatican offered to take over the child’s care, according to CNN. “If he’s still fighting, we’re still fighting,” they wrote in a Facebook post that included a link to Trump’s tweet.

Given all of that, it would seem that Charlie and his parents will get some hope for recovery. Yet, this will not be happening.

Trump’s comments revolve around a key part of the case. There is an experimental treatment in the United States that could help Gard, but Europe is refusing to let his parents actually bring him over here.

Why is the British High Court refusing this? Because of the single-payer government health-care system in Britain. The fact is, such a system anywhere will eventually face a crisis of diminishing resources and rationing care will become necessary.

Moreover, it was ruled that the parents could not leave and pay for their trip and care of Charlie even if they used their own money to do it! They have been donated more than enough to cover all the expenses and the court says they can not even do that!

Rationing is justified by costs in a single-payer system. However, this tragedy cannot even claim to incur any cost to the state. Which means the “state” is asserting authority simply because it can. That is another definition of tyranny.

A Usurpation of Parental Rights by the State

The government of the United Kingdom is usurping the rights of the parents over their child. This is another natural and harmful result of a single-payer insurance system where the government is, in effect, a monopoly business.

The parents have been clear in their wishes. If allowed, they would travel to the U.S. and take this last shot at saving Charlie. The U.K. court has decided to keep the parents prisoner and Charlie under a death sentence. That looks a lot like a tactic of a totalitarian government bent on retaining control of its citizens. How the once-free have fallen further into slavery thanks to another socialist endeavor.

This is also a manifestation of the failure of government-provided health-care which serve as an ominous warning to the U.S. The current debaters in the states over “repeal and replace” for Obamacare in Congress would do well to heed this warning. The warning is that once doctors and patients are beholden to government for providing payment, the government will dictate which lives are worth saving and caring for, and which are not.

The economics of reality will force this to come about. It is better to repeal and let the marketplace be freed to grow and innovate and provide real and beneficial health insurance choices, so that individuals are once more in charge of their own health-care.

By D.T. Osborn

Sources:

CONSERVATIVE TRIBUNE: Charlie Gard’s Mom Responded to Trump Tweet
FOX News: Charlie Gard: May leaves door open for treatment abroad as US hospital offers to treat him for free
Independent Journal Review: Mother of Terminally Ill UK Baby Charlie Gard Just Responded to Trump’s Offer to Help

Charlie Gard Should Be Saved [Video]